Independent review publisher. We do not recover funds or guarantee outcomes.Editorial questions: [email protected]
Independent financial-platform research

Verify the platform before you trust the promise.

Evidence-led reviews of online brokers, exchanges, trading platforms and recovery-related services — with transparent methodology, risk signals and editorial disclosures.

We are a review publisher, not a recovery firm. We do not take custody of funds, ask for wallet keys, or promise that lost assets can be recovered.
Our review standard

Evidence before rating

Every published company review must pass a minimum evidence threshold.
Editorial
Identity & ownershipCorporate footprint and operators
Fee transparencyPricing, retainers and contingencies
Claims verificationRecovery promises and evidence
Complaint signalsPatterns, responses and recency
Ratings are withheld when evidence is incomplete. A polished website alone is never treated as proof of legitimacy.
No pay-to-rank scoresCommercial relationships do not change editorial scores.
Evidence citationsMaterial claims should trace to public or supplied evidence.
Right of replyReviewed organizations can submit documented corrections.
Visible update datesReaders can see when research was last reviewed.
Research desk

Start with the evidence, not the promise

Use our framework to examine a provider before paying a retainer, sending identity documents or sharing transaction records.

Open review directory →

Check a company or domain

Search the review library and due-diligence resources.

Latest platform reviews

Recent editorial assessments

Explore the newest broker, exchange and trading-platform reviews added to our research directory.

Browse all 25 reviews →
Favorable assessment8.8/10

Anmrex

Platform assessment

Our comprehensive assessment of Anmrex Exchange reveals a systematic security and compliance framework with strong structural design in anti-scam and user protection. The platform demonstrates clear institutional platform characteristics with multi-layered governance and transparent mechanisms.

Exchange / cryptoRead review →
Critical risk9.5/10

9xMarkets

9xmarkets.com

9xMarkets is an unlicensed trading platform with no verifiable regulatory oversight. The platform claims to be operated by "9x Markets Ltd" but provides no registration details or physical address. This lack of transparency is a hallmark of fraudulent operations.

BrokerRead review →
Critical risk9.7/10

BlockchainFX

blockchainfx.io

BlockchainFX claims to be "fully licensed and regulated" by the Anjouan Offshore Finance Authority (AOFA). Investors must understand that Anjouan is a small island in the Comoros with virtually zero regulatory enforcement. An AOFA license does not provide negative balance protection, fund segregation audits, or…

Exchange / cryptoRead review →
High risk9.2/10

Giraffe Markets

giraffemarkets.com

Forensic investigators have flagged Giraffe Markets for using fake job offers to lure individuals into depositing funds. If you have been offered a "trading job" contingent on finding clients or depositing your own money to unlock an account, you are witnessing a classic predatory tactic.

BrokerRead review →
High risk8.8/10

GVD Markets

gvdmarkets.com

GVD Markets offers leverage as high as 1:2000 . In Tier-1 jurisdictions (UK, EU, USA), retail leverage is capped at 1:30. A 1:2000 ratio means a 0.05% market movement against your position will wipe out your entire margin.

BrokerRead review →
High risk8.5/10

Spec Markets

specmarkets.com

Spec Markets offers leverage up to 1:1000 . In regulated Tier-1 jurisdictions, retail leverage is typically capped at 1:30 to protect investors. Trading at 1:1000 means a 0.1% market move against you can liquidate your entire balance.

BrokerRead review →
Editorial principles

A review should be reproducible.

Readers should be able to understand why a rating exists and what could change it.

1

Separate facts from allegations

We distinguish verified records, company statements, user reports and editorial interpretation.

2

Penalize unverifiable guarantees

Claims of guaranteed fund recovery or risk-free outcomes receive heightened scrutiny.

3

Publish conflicts and corrections

Commercial relationships and material corrections are disclosed where readers can see them.

Illustrative weighting

Review scorecard

Company scores are only published after minimum evidence requirements are met.

Identity & governance
25%
Fee transparency
20%
Claims & evidence
25%
Consumer safeguards
20%
Complaint handling
10%
Read the full methodology →
!

Recovery fraud can target people who already lost money.

Official consumer-protection agencies warn that prior fraud victims can be targeted again by people promising refunds or asset recovery in exchange for fees or sensitive information. Verify independently before paying or sharing credentials. See our red-flag guide.

Want us to examine a recovery provider?

Send the company name, domain and any public claims you want checked. Submissions are research leads only and do not guarantee publication.

Submit a company